In the news

This page contains news article for those interested in all facets of law enforcement oversight and reform. These articles span all states and cover police departments as well as Sheriff's departments. We're providing this information for those who wish to better understand why oversight is needed, the challenges it faces, and where and how it has improved the communities that have adopted it. News articles from external sources will open in a new tab.

Sheriff Corpus removal hearing scheduled for August; public access still in question

San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus will face a formal removal hearing Aug. 18-29 after the Board of Supervisors voted to remove her from office last month, county officials confirmed on Friday.

Corpus requested the hearing be closed, according to county spokesperson Effie Milionis Verducci. However, the “county is evaluating the request; it has not been determined yet whether the hearing will be open or closed,” Verducci told this news organization. She did not provide a timeline for when a decision would be made.

Jim Lawrence, a former Foster City mayor and a member of civilian oversight group Fixin’ San Mateo County, said the possible closed-door nature of the hearing raises transparency concerns.

Read the full story at The San Jose Mercury News

Accusations Against Sheriff Corpus Underscores Urgent Need for Real Oversight

San Mateo County, CA — The recent accusation against Sheriff Christina Corpus by the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury is not just a singular crisis — it is a symptom of a much deeper problem: the continued failure of our county leadership to implement meaningful, independent civilian oversight of the Sheriff’s Office.

For three years, Fixin’ San Mateo County has urged the Board of Supervisors to establish a Civilian Oversight Commission and appoint an independent Inspector General. The tools have been available since 2020, when the California Legislature passed AB 1185 to empower counties with the authority to oversee their sheriffs. But instead of embracing this opportunity to strengthen public trust and accountability, the Board chose inaction.

While the creation of the Independent Civilian Advisory Committee (ICAC) was a step in the right direction, it was ultimately powerless — lacking the authority, resources, or mandate to investigate misconduct or issue findings. Now, reports allege that Sheriff Corpus interfered in internal investigations involving deputy misconduct, leaving the department in turmoil and public trust badly shaken.

“This is not about one person — it’s about an entire system that has resisted transparency for too long,” said Jim Lawrence, Board Chair of Fixin’ San Mateo County. “We need to act now to rebuild trust and ensure no future sheriff, regardless of who they are, can operate without independent accountability. Oversight protects the public and supports the good officers who serve with integrity every day.”

Fixin’ San Mateo County is calling on the Board of Supervisors to:

  • Immediately strengthen the ICAC by granting it full investigatory powers, a clear mandate, and the resources to operate effectively.
  • Appoint an independent Inspector General with subpoena authority who reports to the public through a truly independent structure — not to the Sheriff.
  • Establish a transparent reform timeline with regular public updates and opportunities for community input.

Counties like Los Angeles and Sonoma have implemented strong oversight models that work — models that improve morale, reward integrity, and build trust between departments and the communities they serve. San Mateo County can do the same.

Media Contact
Jim Lawrence
Fixin’ San Mateo County
408-590-0429
jtlawrence94404@yahoo.com
www.fixinsmc.org

Civil grand jury accuses San Mateo County sheriff of misconduct

The San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury has accused Corpus of a conflict of interest pertaining to the hiring and supervision of her department’s former executive director of administration, Victor Aenlle, with whom she had a close personal relationship. The grand jury also accused Corpus of three counts of retaliation, pertaining to the termination of former assistant sheriff Ryan Monaghan, the transfer of Captain Brian Philip, and the arrest of Deputy Carlos Tapia, the president of the deputy sheriff’s association.

Read the full story at NBC Bay Area

Sheriff arrives at courthouse where the grand jury is meeting

San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus, who is battling corruption allegations, arrived at the private door of the San Mateo County Superior Court at the Government Center in Redwood City on Friday morning.

Upstairs, the county’s civil grand jury was meeting to consider whether to recommend her removal from office. If the grand jury decides to issue an “accusation” against her, the case would proceed to a jury trial.

The Post wasn’t able to determine whether she appeared before the grand jury on Friday. Grand jury proceedings are secret.

Read the full story at Palo Alto Daily Post

Sheriff files suit against DA after she’s subpoenaed to testify before civil grand jury

San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corps is trying to stop two attempts to remove her removal from office — including trying to shield herself from testifying before a civil grand jury. Corpus had been subpoenaed to testify before the civil grand jury on Tuesday, but her attorneys filed a motion to stop her testimony, claiming that District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe’s office ought to be recused since he is acting as both the administrator of the civil grand jury and as prosecutor.

Read the full story at Palo Alto Daily Post

San Mateo County sheriff subpoenaed to grand jury

Sheriff Christina Corpus is requesting the recusal of District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe from any prosecutorial role and administration of civil grand jury proceedings regarding the sheriff, according to a claim filed with the courts Monday. On May 28, Wagstaffe subpoenaed Corpus — who may be the first sheriff removed from office in California’s history over allegations of misconduct — to appear for the civil grand jury to “testify as a witness in a pending investigation” on June 10. 

Read the full story at The San Mateo Daily Journal

San Mateo court rejects Sheriff Corpus’ effort to halt removal process

A San Mateo County court rejected embattled Sheriff Christina Corpus’ attempt to block removal proceedings against her, County Attorney John Nibbelin announced during a Board of Supervisors meeting Tuesday. “The court denied the petition for a TRO (temporary restraining order),” Nibbelin said. “The court indicated that it would be premature to rule on matters as such.” According to Nibbelin, the temporary restraining order was denied on procedural grounds rather than on the substance of the filing. Corpus’ attorneys argued the removal process violates her right to due process and pledged to continue challenging it in court.

Read the full story at The San Jose Mercury News

Fixin’ San Mateo County Calls for Public Release of Notice of Intent to Remove Sheriff

San Mateo County, CA – Fixin’ San Mateo County strongly urges Sheriff Christina Corpus to remove her objection to the public release of the 59-page Notice of Intent to Remove the Sheriff (NOI).

At today’s special meeting, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to remove Sheriff Christina Corpus from office, based on the allegations delineated in the NOI. The County had offered Sheriff Corpus the opportunity to keep the NOI secret, and her attorneys asked to do so. Sheriff Corpus campaigned on a platform of transparency and integrity, and Fixin’ urges her to reconsider her request to keep the NOI under wraps. Powerful people operating in secrecy is a significant part of the reason the county finds itself in this difficult situation.

“I am disappointed that the Sheriff sought to keep this report out of the public eye,” said Jim Lawrence, Board Chair of Fixin’ San Mateo County. “With this secrecy, we don’t know what the supervisors voted on today.  The public deserves transparency.” 

The NOI was developed with taxpayer dollars after the overwhelming passage to Measure A.  We commend the Board for exercising its oversight responsibility — first by hiring an independent investigator to look at concerns raised by employees of the Sheriff’s Office, then acting on the findings by sponsoring Measure A.  But transparency is one of the key advantages of oversight, and release of the NOI is an essential step.

The next step to better oversight is to hire a permanent Inspector General, instead of relying on ad hoc crisis response. If we had an Inspector General the situation may not have come to this. Deputies would have had an independent avenue to escalate their complaints and steps would have been taken earlier to address their concerns. 

Fixin’ has led a broad coalition in pursuit of reform. Six local governments representing 60% of the county’s population endorsed our efforts, alongside more than 35 organizations advocating for stronger oversight. The county has paid out over $13 million in settlements related to misconduct in the past four years, with millions more in pending lawsuits and the costs of a special election.

Fixin’ remains steadfast in our support for the hardworking deputies who risk their lives to protect our community. Oversight is not punitive; it should be of benefit to the deputies and staff as well as the larger community. True public safety requires both accountability and trust among law enforcement employees, and between law enforcement and the people they serve.

Media Contact:

Jim Lawrence
Fixin’ San Mateo County
408-590-0429, jtlawrence94404@yahoo.com